No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 26, 2026.
Association Between Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension and Risk of Cardiovascular Diseases in Women in the United Kingdom
Nicola J. Adderley, Anuradhaa Subramanian, Krishnarajah Nirantharakumar and 4 more
JAMA Neurology · 2019
doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.1812
Abstract
Question. Is the risk of cardiovascular disease greater in women with idiopathic intracranial hypertension than in women of the same age and body mass index but without idiopathic intracranial hypertension?
Findings. In this population-based matched controlled cohort study of 2760 female patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension and 27 125 control patients, women with this condition had twice the risk for cardiovascular disease compared with their counterparts with similar body mass index and age. Between 2005 and 2017, the incidence and prevalence of idiopathic intracranial hypertension have tripled.
Meaning. Idiopathic intracranial hypertension appeared to be a risk factor for cardiovascular disease in women; changing patient management to address the risk factors for cardiovascular disease may reduce long-term morbidity.
Importance. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk has not been previously evaluated in a large matched cohort study in idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH).
Objectives. To estimate the risk of composite cardiovascular events, heart failure, ischemic heart disease, stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA), type 2 diabetes, and hypertension in women with idiopathic intracranial hypertension and compare it with the risk in women, matched on body mass index (BMI) and age, without the condition; and to evaluate the prevalence and incidence of IIH.
Design, Setting, and Participants. This population-based matched controlled cohort study used 28 years of data, from January 1, 1990, to January 17, 2018, from The Health Improvement Network (THIN), an anonymized, nationally representative electronic medical records database in the United Kingdom. All female patients aged 16 years or older were eligible for inclusion. Female patients with IIH (n = 2760) were included and randomly matched with up to 10 control patients (n = 27 125) by BMI and age.
Main Outcomes and Measures. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) of cardiovascular outcomes were calculated using Cox regression models. The primary outcome was a composite of any CVD (heart failure, ischemic heart disease, and stroke/TIA), and the secondary outcomes were each CVD outcome, type 2 diabetes, and hypertension.
Results. In total, 2760 women with IIH and 27 125 women without IIH were included. Age and BMI were similar between the 2 groups, with a median (interquartile range) age of 32.1 (25.6-42.0) years in the exposed group and 32.1 (25.7-42.1) years in the control group; in the exposed group 1728 women (62.6%) were obese, and in the control group 16514 women (60.9%) were obese. Higher absolute risks for all cardiovascular outcomes were observed in women with IIH compared with control patients. The aHRs were as follows: composite cardiovascular events, 2.10 (95% CI, 1.61-2.74; P <.001); heart failure, 1.97 (95% CI, 1.16-3.37; P =.01); ischemic heart disease, 1.94 (95% CI, 1.27-2.94; P =.002); stroke/TIA, 2.27 (95% CI, 1.61-3.21; P <.001); type 2 diabetes, 1.30 (95% CI, 1.07-1.57; P =.009); and hypertension, 1.55 (95% CI, 1.30-1.84; P <.001). The incidence of IIH in female patients more than tripled between 2005 and 2017, from 2.5 to 9.3 per 100 000 person-years. Similarly, IIH prevalence increased in the same period, from 26 to 79 per 100 000 women. Incidence increased markedly with BMI higher than 30.
Conclusions and Relevance. Idiopathic intracranial hypertension in women appeared to be associated with a 2-fold increase in CVD risk; change in patient care to modify risk factors for CVD may reduce long-term morbidity for women with IIH and warrants further evaluation.
References 51
- 1.
Markey KA, Mollan SP, Jensen RH, Sinclair AJ Understanding idiopathic intracranial hypertension: mechanisms, management, and future directions. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15(1):78-91
Not in our library10.1016/s1474-4422(15)00298-7
- 2.
Mulla Y, Markey KA, Woolley RL, Patel S, Mollan SP, Sinclair AJ Headache determines quality of life in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. J Headache Pain. 2015;16:521
Not in our library10.1186/s10194-015-0521-9
- 3.
- 4.
Friedman DI, Liu GT, Digre KB Revised diagnostic criteria for the pseudotumor cerebri syndrome in adults and children. Neurology. 2013;81(13):1159-1165
Not in our library10.1212/wnl.0b013e3182a55f17
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
Daniels AB, Liu GT, Volpe NJ, Profiles of obesity, weight gain, and quality of life in idiopathic intracranial hypertension (pseudotumor cerebri). Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143(4):635-641
Not in our library10.1016/j.ajo.2006.12.040
- 8.
- 9.
Lu Y, Hajifathalian K, Ezzati M, Woodward M, Rimm EB, Danaei G; Global Burden of Metabolic Risk Factors for Chronic Diseases Collaboration (BMI Mediated Effects) Metabolic mediators of the effects of body-mass index, overweight, and obesity on coronary heart disease and stroke: a pooled analysis of 97 prospective cohorts with 1.8 million participants. Lancet. 2014;383(9921):970-983
Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(13)61836-x
- 10.
Fontana L, Hu FB Optimal body weight for health and longevity: bridging basic, clinical, and population research. Aging Cell. 2014;13(3):391-400
Not in our library10.1111/acel.12207
- 11.
O’Reilly MW, Westgate CSJ, Hornby C, A unique androgen excess signature in idiopathic intracranial hypertension is linked to cerebrospinal fluid dynamics. JCI Insight. 2019;4(6):e125348
Not in our library10.1172/jci.insight.125348
- 12.
Ding EL, Song Y, Malik VS, Liu S Sex differences of endogenous sex hormones and risk of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2006;295(11):1288-1299
Not in our library10.1001/jama.295.11.1288
- 13.
Dalmasso C, Maranon R, Patil C, Cardiometabolic effects of chronic hyperandrogenemia in a new model of postmenopausal polycystic ovary syndrome. Endocrinology. 2016;157(7):2920-2927
Not in our library10.1210/en.2015-1617
- 14.
Azziz R, Carmina E, Dewailly D,; Androgen Excess Society Positions statement: criteria for defining polycystic ovary syndrome as a predominantly hyperandrogenic syndrome: an Androgen Excess Society guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91(11):4237-4245
Not in our library10.1210/jc.2006-0178
- 15.
Morgan CL, Jenkins-Jones S, Currie CJ, Rees DA Evaluation of adverse outcome in young women with polycystic ovary syndrome versus matched, reference controls: a retrospective, observational study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97(9):3251-3260
Not in our library10.1210/jc.2012-1690
- 16.
Mani H, Levy MJ, Davies MJ, Diabetes and cardiovascular events in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a 20-year retrospective cohort study. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2013;78(6):926-934
Not in our library10.1111/cen.12068
- 17.
Randeva HS, Tan BK, Weickert MO, Cardiometabolic aspects of the polycystic ovary syndrome. Endocr Rev. 2012;33(5):812-841
Not in our library10.1210/er.2012-1003
- 18.
General Practitioners Committee NHS Employers and NHS England. 2016/17 General Medical Services (GMS) Contract Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) Guidance for GMS Contract 2016/17. https://www.http://nhsemployers.org/-/media/Employers/Documents/Primary-care-contracts/QOF/2016-17/2016-17-QOF-guidance-documents.pdf. Published April 2016. Accessed May 31, 2019.
Not in our library
- 19.
Doran T, Fullwood C, Gravelle H, Pay-for-performance programs in family practices in the United Kingdom. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(4):375-384
Not in our library10.1056/nejmsa055505
- 20.
Lewis JD, Schinnar R, Bilker WB, Wang X, Strom BL Validation studies of the health improvement network (THIN) database for pharmacoepidemiology research. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2007;16(4):393-401
Not in our library10.1002/pds.1335
- 21.
Lévesque LE, Hanley JA, Kezouh A, Suissa S Problem of immortal time bias in cohort studies: example using statins for preventing progression of diabetes. BMJ. 2010;340:b5087
Not in our library10.1136/bmj.b5087
- 22.
NHS Digital Business Rules for Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) 2017/18 Secondary Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease (CHD). Leeds, England: NHS Digital; 2017.
Not in our library
- 23.
Adams J, Ryan V, White M How accurate are Townsend deprivation scores as predictors of self-reported health? a comparison with individual level data. J Public Health (Oxf). 2005;27(1):101-106
Not in our library10.1093/pubmed/fdh193
- 24.
Frič R, Pripp AH, Eide PK Cardiovascular risk factors in Chiari malformation and idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Brain Behav. 2017;7(5):e00677
Not in our library10.1002/brb3.677
- 25.
Best J, Silvestri G, Burton B, Foot B, Acheson J The incidence of blindness due to idiopathic intracranial hypertension in the UK. Open Ophthalmol J. 2013;7(7):26-29
Not in our library10.2174/1874364101307010026
- 26.
Bigal ME, Kurth T, Santanello N, Migraine and cardiovascular disease: a population-based study. Neurology. 2010;74(8):628-635
Not in our library10.1212/wnl.0b013e3181d0cc8b
- 27.
Yiangou A, Mitchell J, Markey KA, Therapeutic lumbar puncture for headache in idiopathic intracranial hypertension: minimal gain, is it worth the pain? Cephalalgia. 2019;39(2):245-253
Not in our library10.1177/0333102418782192
- 28.
Canoy D, Luben R, Welch A, Fat distribution, body mass index and blood pressure in 22,090 men and women in the Norfolk cohort of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC-Norfolk) study. J Hypertens. 2004;22(11):2067-2074
Not in our library10.1097/00004872-200411000-00007
- 29.
Yusuf S, Hawken S, Ounpuu S,; INTERHEART Study Investigators Obesity and the risk of myocardial infarction in 27,000 participants from 52 countries: a case-control study. Lancet. 2005;366(9497):1640-1649
Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(05)67663-5
- 30.
Grundy SM, Adams-Huet B, Vega GL Variable contributions of fat content and distribution to metabolic syndrome risk factors. Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2008;6(4):281-288
Not in our library10.1089/met.2008.0026
- 31.
Hornby C, Botfield H, O’Reilly MW, Evaluating the fat distribution in idiopathic intracranial hypertension using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scanning. Neuroophthalmology. 2017;42(2):99-104
Not in our library10.1080/01658107.2017.1334218
- 32.
Sinclair AJ, Burdon MA, Nightingale PG, Low energy diet and intracranial pressure in women with idiopathic intracranial hypertension: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2010;341:c2701
Not in our library10.1136/bmj.c2701
- 33.
- 34.
Kilgore KP, Lee MS, Leavitt JA, Re-evaluating the incidence of idiopathic intracranial hypertension in an era of increasing obesity. Ophthalmology. 2017;124(5):697-700
Not in our library10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.01.006
- 35.
Curry WT Jr, Butler WE, Barker FG II Rapidly rising incidence of cerebrospinal fluid shunting procedures for idiopathic intracranial hypertension in the United States, 1988-2002. Neurosurgery. 2005;57(1):97-108
Not in our library10.1227/01.neu.0000163094.23923.e5
- 36.
Marmot M Social determinants of health inequalities. Lancet. 2005;365(9464):1099-1104
Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(05)74234-3
- 37.
Wilkinson R, Marmot M, eds. Social Determinants of Health: The Solid Facts 2nd edition. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2003:31.
Not in our library
- 38.
Pickett KE, Pearl M Multilevel analyses of neighbourhood socioeconomic context and health outcomes: a critical review. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001;55(2):111-122
Not in our library10.1136/jech.55.2.111
- 39.
Phillimore P, Beattie A, Townsend P Widening inequality of health in northern England, 1981-91. BMJ. 1994;308(6937):1125-1128
Not in our library10.1136/bmj.308.6937.1125
- 40.
Barnett K, Mercer SW, Norbury M, Watt G, Wyke S, Guthrie B Epidemiology of multimorbidity and implications for health care, research, and medical education: a cross-sectional study. Lancet. 2012;380(9836):37-43
Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60240-2
Cited by papers we hold 2
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.