Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 23, 2026.

Evaluation of Sleep Habits and Disturbances Among US Adults, 2017-2020

Hongkun Di, Yanjun Guo, Iyas Daghlas and 5 more

JAMA Network Open · 2022

doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.40788

Abstract

Question. What were the profiles of sleep habits and the prevalence of sleep disturbances among US adults in 2017 to 2020?

Findings. In this nationally representative cross-sectional analysis with 9004 adults, differences in sleep patterns between workdays and free days were observed (0.65 hour for sleep duration, 0.23 hour for sleep time, and 1.00 hour for wake time). With regard to sleep disturbances, 30.5% of adults experienced 1 hour or more of sleep debt, 46.5% experienced 1 hour or more of social jet lag, 29.8% had trouble sleeping, and 27.2% experienced daytime sleepiness.

Meaning. These findings elaborate on sleep habits and disturbances among US adults and provide evidence to further investigate potential approaches to optimize overall US sleep health.

Importance. Unhealthy sleep behaviors and sleep disturbances are associated with higher risk of multiple diseases and mortality. The current profiles of sleep habits and disturbances, particularly the differences between workdays and free days, are unknown in the contemporary US.

Objective. To comprehensively evaluate sleep habits on workdays and free days and the prevalence of sleep disturbances among US adults.

Design, Setting, and Participants. This study is a cross-sectional analysis of US nationally representative data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2017-2020) among adults aged 20 years or older. Data analysis was performed from February to May 2022.

Main Outcomes and Measures. The main outcomes were means and/or distributions of sleep habits, including sleep duration and sleep-wake timing on workdays and free days, sleep debt (ie, the difference between sleep duration on free days and mean weekly sleep duration), and social jet lag (ie, the difference between the midpoint between sleep and wake time on workdays and free days). Prevalence of trouble sleeping (ie, participants told a doctor or other health professional that they have trouble sleeping) and daytime sleepiness (ie, self-reported feeling of being overly sleepy during the day ≥5 times per month) were also determined.

Results. A total of 9004 individuals (mean [SE] age, 48.3 [0.53] years; 4635 women [51.9%]; 3158 non-Hispanic White [62.8%]) were included in the current study. The mean sleep duration was 7.59 hours (95% CI, 7.54 to 7.64 hours) on workdays and 8.24 hours (95% CI, 8.17 to 8.31 hours) on free days (difference, 0.65 hour). The mean sleep and wake times were at 11:02 pm (95% CI, 10:57 pm to 11:17 pm) and 6:41 am (95% CI, 6:36 am to 6:45 am), respectively, on workdays and 11:25 pm (95% CI, 11:21 pm to 11:35 pm) and 7:41 am (95% CI, 7:37 am to 7:46 am), respectively, on free days (differences, 0.23 hour for sleep time and 1.00 hour for wake time). On workdays, 23.1% (95% CI, 21.3% to 24.9%) of adults slept less than 7 hours and 25.4% (95% CI, 24.1% to 26.6%) went to sleep at midnight or later; the corresponding percentages changed to 12.9% (95% CI, 11.6% to 14.1%) and 40.9% (95% CI, 38.4% to 43.5%), respectively, on free days. Furthermore, the mean sleep debt was 0.73 hours (95% CI, 0.68 to 0.77 hours), and mean social jet lag was 1.10 hours (95% CI, 1.05 to 1.15 hours); 30.5% (95% CI, 26.8% to 33.3%) of adults experienced 1 hour or more of sleep debt, and 46.5% (95% CI, 42.6% to 50.3%) experienced 1 hour or more of social jet lag. The prevalence of trouble sleeping was 29.8% (95% CI, 28.2% to 31.5%), and that of daytime sleepiness was 27.2% (95% CI, 25.0% to 29.5%).

Conclusions and Relevance. In 2017 to 2020, US adults showed variability in sleep habits between workdays and free days, with longer sleep duration and later sleep-wake phases on free days, and high percentages of US adults experienced long-term sleep deprivation, chronic social jet lag, and frequent sleep disturbances. These findings provide evidence to further investigate potential approaches to optimize overall US sleep health.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 23, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Introduction

Suboptimal sleep is associated with poor cognitive functioning, mental health, and cardiometabolic health.,,,,, As a result of modern lifestyles, sleep habits of adults vary across workdays and free days. People commonly extend sleep duration on free days to compensate for sleep debt accumulated over the workweek or show irregular, weekly changes in sleep-wake timing, resulting in chronic sleep loss and circadian disruption., Consequently, it is crucial to comprehensively assess the current sleep habits and circadian characteristics among US adults, which could help address the sleep problems and their related health outcomes.

Several studies, have reported the sleep duration among US adults only on workdays and the prevalence of sleep disturbances up to 2014. However, to our knowledge, no studies have explicitly investigated the sleep-wake timing and regularity of sleep habits across workdays and free days, all of which are essential components of healthy sleep. Therefore, by using nationally representative data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 2017 to 2020, we evaluated whether the sleep duration and sleep-wake timing among US adults differed between workdays and free days and the extent to which they experienced sleep debt (ie, the difference between sleep duration on free days and mean weekly sleep duration), social jet lag (ie, the difference between the midpoint between sleep and wake time on workdays and free days), and sleep disturbances.

Study Population

NHANES is an ongoing, biennial, nationally representative series of surveys designed to monitor the health and nutritional status of the noninstitutionalized civilian US population that uses a complex, multistage, probability sampling design, with oversampling of different subpopulations to improve estimate accuracy. Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, field operations were suspended in March 2020, and data collected from 2019 to March 2020 were combined with data from the 2017 to 2018 cycle, forming a nationally representative sample of NHANES 2017 to March 2020 prepandemic data. Sample weights are provided to account for the complex survey design, including oversampling, survey nonresponse, and poststratification. The survey protocols were approved by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Health Statistics ethics review board, and additional details are available elsewhere. The study sample comprised adult subjects aged 20 years and older who responded to questions regarding sleep health contained in the interview components of 2017 to 2020 NHANES. All participants provided written informed consent at the time of the survey. Because we used publicly available data sets from NHANES, institutional review board approval and informed consent were not required for the current analysis, in accordance with 45 CFR §46. This cross-sectional study followed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) reporting guideline.

Assessment of Sleep Habits and Disturbances

The Munich ChronoType Questionnaire was used to investigate the sleep-wake timing on workdays and free days (or weekdays and weekends for nonemployed individuals, including those who were retired, unemployed, and students). Sleep duration (hours) on workdays and free days was derived from reported sleep-wake timing, and absolute and relative sleep debt were calculated as the absolute and actual difference between sleep duration on free days and the mean weekly sleep duration, respectively. Midsleep time on workdays and free days was calculated as the midpoint between sleep and wake time, and the absolute and relative social jet lag were calculated as the absolute and actual difference between midsleep time on workdays and midsleep time on free days, respectively., The basic questionnaire items or computations of these sleep traits are described in eTable 1 in the Supplement. Sleep duration (<7 hours [short sleep], 7-9 hours, and ≥9 hours [long sleep]), sleep time (before 10:00 pm [early bedtime], 10:00 pm to midnight, midnight or later [late bedtime]), and wake time (before 6:00 am [early wake time], 6:00 am to 8:00 am, 8:00 am or later [late wake time]) were further defined. Sleep debt and social jet lag were both expressed as absolute differences and were further dichotomized as low (<2 hours) or high (≥2 hours) for sleep debt and as mild (<2 hours) or heavy (≥2 hours) for social jet lag, as done in prior studies.,,,

The sleep disturbances questions by in-home interviews fall into 3 general categories: breathing problem during sleep, sleep difficulty, and daytime sleepiness. Given the investigation method that the interviewers directly asked the participants themselves, this study only included trouble sleeping and daytime sleepiness as sleep disturbances for the data reliability and clinical relevance. Trouble sleeping was defined as the participants told a doctor or other health professional that they have trouble sleeping. Daytime sleepiness was defined as self-reported feeling of being overly sleepy during the day 5 or more times per month. The questions, values, and categories are presented in eTable 1 in the Supplement.

Assessment of Sociodemographic and Employment Variables

A standardized questionnaire was used to collect information on sex, age, race, ethnicity, education level, and family income. Information on race and ethnicity was self-reported by NHANES participants according to categories provided by the National Center for Health Statistics (Mexican American, non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic White, other Hispanic, or other). Mexican American and other Hispanic groups were combined to create the Hispanic group. Other includes any other race or ethnicity other than non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, or Hispanic. This information was collected to evaluate sleep habits and disturbances by race and ethnicity. Age was stratified as 20 to 39, 40 to 59, 60 to 74, and 75 or more years old. Education was grouped into a categorical variable, with categories as follows: less than high school, high school, and greater than high school. Family income levels were classified into 3 categories: ratio of family income to poverty level less than 1.30, 1.30 to 3.49, and 3.50 or higher. The Occupation Questionnaire was used to collect and create the following employment information: work status (nonemployed [including the unemployed, retirees, students, and those not actively looking for work], part time [1-34 hours per week], and full time [≥35 hours per week]), and work schedule (traditional 9 am to 5 pm day, regular shift work [evening or nights or early mornings], rotating shift work [early mornings, days, and nights], and did not work).

Statistical Analysis

Sample weights, clustering, and stratification were incorporated in all analyses because of the complex sampling design of the NHANES, as required to analyze the NHANES data. Data are reported as weighted and nationally representative estimates of means and frequencies, unless otherwise stated.

First, estimates of the weighted means and/or distributions of sleep duration, sleep-wake timing, sleep debt, and social jet lag, and the weighted prevalence of sleep disturbances were examined in the total population and by major population subgroups, including age, sex, race and ethnicity, education, income level, work status, and work schedule. All 95% CIs were estimated using SEs obtained by Taylor series linearization., Sample means were compared using analysis of variance, and sample prevalence or proportions were compared using Rao-Scott χ2 tests. In sensitivity analysis, sleep debt was redefined as the absolute difference in sleep duration between work and free days, aiming to illustrate the distribution of sleep debt accumulating during the workweek by sleeping in on free days. Second, estimated odds ratios (ORs) for the association of covariates with sleep characteristics mentioned above were identified using multivariable-adjusted logistic regression models. The testing global null hypothesis was set as β = 0. T trends across subgroups of age, education, and family income level were calculated by including these stratification factors as continuous variables in the logistic regression models.

Data analysis was performed from February to May 2022. All data analyses were conducted using survey procedures in SAS statistical software version 9.4 (SAS Institute). All statistical tests were performed with a significance level of 2-sided P <.05.

Participant Characteristics

After excluding 210 participants (2.27%) with missing data on sleep-wake timing and 18 (0.19%) with missing data on sleep disturbances, a total of 9004 individuals (mean [SE] age, 48.3 [0.53] years; 4635 women [51.9%]; 3158 non-Hispanic White [62.8%]) were analyzed. Unweighted sample sizes overall by sociodemographic and employment characteristics are presented in Table 1. The basic characteristics of participants included and excluded in the analyses are presented in eTable 2 in the Supplement. Compared with individuals excluded, those included were of similar age and sex, but were more likely to be non-Hispanic White, full-time workers with a 9 am to 5 pm schedule, and to have higher education and family income levels.

Sleep Duration and Sleep-Wake Timing

In 2017 to 2020, the mean sleep duration was significantly longer on free days than on workdays (8.24 hours [95% CI, 8.17-8.31 hours] vs 7.59 hours [95% CI, 7.54-7.64 hours]; difference, 0.65 hour [95% CI, 0.63-0.67 hour]; P <.001) (Figure 1A and eTable 3 in the Supplement). On workdays, 23.1% (95% CI, 21.3%-24.9%) of adults had short sleep duration (<7 hours) and 19.7% (95% CI, 18.5%-21.0%) had long sleep duration (≥9 hours). On free days, 12.9% (95% CI, 11.6%-14.1%) of adults had short sleep duration and 38.5% (95% CI, 36.7%-40.3%) had long sleep duration (Figure 1B).

Sleep-wake timing also differed markedly across workdays and free days. On workdays, the mean sleep time was 11:02 pm (95% CI, 10:57 pm to 11:17 pm) and the mean wake time was 6:41 am (95% CI, 6:36 am to 6:45 am), whereas on free days, the mean sleep time was 11:25 pm (95% CI, 11:21 pm to 11:35 pm) and the mean wake time was 7:41 am (95% CI, 7:37 am to 7:46 am) (P <.001) (eTable 4 and eTable 5 in the Supplement). On workdays, 18.5% (95% CI, 16.8% to 20.2%) of adults fell asleep before 10:00 pm and 25.4% (95% CI, 24.1% to 26.6%) did so at midnight or later; 31.6% (95% CI, 29.8% to 33.5%) of adults woke up before 6:00 am and 21.4% (95% CI, 20.1% to 22.6%) woke up at 8:00 am or later (Figures 1C and 1D). On free days, 11.0% (95% CI, 9.70% to 12.3%) of adults fell asleep before 10:00 pm and 40.9% (95% CI, 38.4% to 43.5%) did so at midnight or later; 12.0% (95% CI, 10.7% to 13.4%) of adults woke up before 6:00 am, and 47.7% (95% CI, 45.6% to 49.7%) woke up at 8:00 am or later (Figures 1C and 1D). Midsleep times also showed a similar frequency distribution: the largest binned group shifted to later hours on free days (eFigure 1 in the Supplement).

Sleep Debt, Social Jet Lag, and Sleep Disturbances

The mean sleep debt was 0.73 hour (95% CI, 0.68-0.77 hour); 30.5% (95% CI, 26.8%-33.3%) of adults accumulated at least 1 hour of sleep debt per week, and 9.75% (95% CI, 8.65%-10.8%) accumulated at least 2 hours per week (Figure 2 and eTable 6 in the Supplement); 15.0% (95% CI, 13.0%-16.9%) had negative relative sleep debt (Figure 2). Similar distributions were observed when sleep debt was expressed as the absolute difference in sleep duration between work and free days, with the least sleep debt among older adults (eTable 7 and eFigure 2 in the Supplement). The mean social jet lag was 1.10 hours (95% CI, 1.05-1.15 hours), 46.5% (95% CI, 42.6%-50.3%) of adults had at least 1 hour of social jet lag per week, and 19.3% (95% CI, 17.7%-20.9%) had at least 2 hours jet lag per week (Figure 3 and eTable 8 in the Supplement); 6.54% (95% CI, 4.09%-9.04%) had negative relative social jet lag (Figure 3). The estimated prevalence of trouble sleeping was 29.8% (95% CI, 28.2%-31.5%), and that of daytime sleepiness was 27.2% (95% CI, 25.0%-29.5%) (Table 2).

Subgroup and Multivariable Analysis

In univariable analyses, consistent differences in sleep duration or of the proportion of normal bedtime to wake time between workdays and free days were observed in most subgroups, except for participants aged 75 years and older (eTable 3, eTable 4, and eTable 5 in the Supplement). The percentages of adults with high sleep debt (≥2 hours) and heavy social jet lag (≥2 hours) were both higher among younger adults, non-Hispanic Black individuals, full-time workers, and regular shift workers (eTable 6 and eTable 8 in the Supplement). Trouble sleeping was more prevalent among older adults, women, non-Hispanic White individuals, and nonemployed people, whereas daytime sleepiness was more prevalent among younger adults, women, non-Hispanic White individuals, nonemployed people, and those with lower income level (Table 2).

After multivariable adjustment, age, sex, race, ethnicity, work status, and work schedule were associated with short sleep duration on workdays; age, sex, race, ethnicity, education, and work schedule were associated with long sleep duration on free days; and age, race, ethnicity, family income level and work schedule were associated with late bedtime (eTable 9 and eTable 10 in the Supplement). Age, race, ethnicity, family income level, work status, and schedule were associated with both high sleep debt and heavy social jet lag (eTable 11 in the Supplement). Age, sex, race, ethnicity, educational level, and work schedule were associated with trouble sleeping, whereas age, sex, race, ethnicity, family income level and work status were associated with daytime sleepiness (Table 2).

Discussion

This cross-sectional study found that in 2017 to 2020, US adults had distinct sleep habits on workdays and free days, with a 0.65-hour longer sleep duration, a 0.23-hour later sleep time, and a 1.00-hour later wake time on free days; 30.5% and 46.5% of adults experienced at least 1 hour of sleep debt and social jet lag, respectively. The prevalence of trouble sleeping and daytime sleepiness were 29.8% and 27.2%, respectively.

To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the sleep duration among nationally representative US adults on workdays and free days separately. In our study, the estimated sleep duration was 7.59 hours and the proportion of adults with short sleep (<7 hours) and long sleep (≥9 hours) were 23.1% and 19.7%, respectively, on workdays. These findings were not consistent with previous studies,, showing a sleep duration of 7.18 hours in 2012 among US adults aged 18 years and older and 7.00 hours in 2014 among adults aged 16 years and older. Consistently, the prevalence of adults with sleep shorter than 7 hours in this study was lower than prior estimates from the National Health Interview Survey (29.2% in 2012) and from the Behavioral Risk Factors Surveillance System (35.0% in 2014 and 13.0% in 2018).,, The differences could be due to differences in the questionnaires, since participants in NHANES before 2015, or National Health Interview Survey and Behavioral Risk Factors Surveillance System, were required to self-report round numbers, whereas estimates were rounded to the nearest half-hour in NHANES 2017 to 2020. Moreover, we first estimated that the sleep debt among US adults was 0.73 hours, 30.5% of adults experienced at least 1 hour of sleep debt, and 9.75% experienced at least 2 hours of sleep debt. Given that emerging evidence suggests that, in addition to irregular sleep duration, sleep debt could be associated with obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular health, and mood disorders,,,, more evidence is needed on the trend in sleep debt over time and the benefits of reducing its risk, even in those without substantive sleep deprivation.

We provided an overall profile of sleep-wake patterns and the differences between workdays and free days among US adults. The sleep-wake timing was much later on free days (11:25 pm to 7:41 am) than on workdays (11:02 pm to 6:41 am); the proportion of late bedtime (midnight or later) increased from 25.4% to 40.9% (15.5% increase), and the proportion of late wake time (8:00 am or later) increased from 21.4% to 47.7% (26.3% increase). This was in line with a previous study that identified within-week patterns of bedtime among US adults in 2003 to 2006, showing varying degrees of delay in the midpoint of bedtime on weekend nights, compared with weekday nights. In addition, our results showed a higher percentage of late bedtime among US adults in 2017 to 2020 than estimates in a cohort study from 21 other high-income countries reporting that 18.5% of participants aged 35 to 70 years slept at midnight or later during 2003 to 2009. Additionally, we first estimated that the social jet lag among US adults was 1.10 hours, and 46.5% of adults were estimated to have experienced at least 1 hour of social jet lag, with 19.3% having experienced at least 2 hours. A previous large-scale epidemiological study of more than 65 000 European participants showed that 33% of the population had 2 hours or more of social jet lag, and 69% reported at least 1 hour from 2002 to 2010. A growing body of evidence suggests that maintaining optimal sleep-wake timing and improving the correspondence between biological and social clocks may be an important consideration in the management of obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease.,,, More research is needed to determine long-term trends and further elucidate the importance of instability in sleep timing for public health.

Sleep disturbances remain highly prevalent among US adults in our study: 29.8% of adults had trouble sleeping and 27.2% experienced daytime sleepiness (via the NHANES Sleepiness questionnaire). The prevalence of trouble sleeping and daytime sleepiness was both higher than prior estimates. On the basis of data from adults aged 18 years and older from the National Health Interview Survey from 2002 to 2012, the prevalence of trouble sleeping increased from 17.5% to 19.2%, and excessive daytime sleepiness increased from 9.80% to 12.7%. Cross-sectional data of NHANES showed that the prevalence of trouble sleeping in 2005 to 2018 was 27.74%, and the prevalence of excessive daytime sleepiness in 2005 to 2008 was 18.5%., These increases may have been influenced by single-item questionnaires in our study, which used a broader definition. Still, these results underscore that sleep disturbances remain a major challenge for promotion of healthy sleep in the US.

The small differences in sleep duration and sleep-wake timing between workdays and free days among elderly individuals (ie, those aged ≥75 years) could be because most older adults did not work. Consistent with previous study, substantially higher prevalence of short sleep duration on workdays, long sleep duration on free days, late bedtime, high sleep debt, or heavy social jet lag was observed among non-Hispanic Black individuals, full-time workers, and regular shift workers. Working the night shift or long hours were probably the most relevant variables associated with changes in normal circadian rhythm, thus depriving individuals of a normal sleep cycle. The higher proportion of night shift workers among the non-Hispanic Black individuals could partly account for the association between race and ethnicity and sleep problems. Additional studies are warranted to further understand whether certain groups with poor sleep may be affected disproportionately.

Strengths and Limitations

The strengths of this study include the use of a large, nationally representative survey and the separate assessments of sleep duration and sleep-wake timing on workdays and free days. This study also has several limitations. First, information on sleep data was self-reported rather than objectively measured and, therefore, was prone to misreporting and recall bias. Second, participants with missing data on sleep were excluded, which may affect the national representativeness of these findings. Third, in calculating mean weekly sleep duration, we assumed that most individuals followed a weekly structure of 5 weekdays or workdays and 2 weekends or free days. The part-time workers may not follow this structure, but they were the smallest subgroup of participants. Fourth, though social jet lag has been widely used as a measure of circadian misalignment, it could not fully accurately represent the degree of circadian disruption. Fifth, the question included in the NHANES sleepiness questionnaire was not validated. Future studies are needed with the standard questionnaires of sleep disturbances. Sixth, because of the unavailability of data, we failed to consider the impacts of seasonality of agricultural work and standard time clock changes on sleep habits, nor did we evaluate subjective sleep satisfaction.

Conclusions

In this cross-sectional study, in 2017 to 2020, US adults showed variability in sleep habits across a week, with longer sleep duration and later sleep-wake phase on free days. A high percentage of US adults experienced long-term sleep deprivation, chronic social jet lag, and frequent sleep disturbances. These findings provide evidence to further investigate potential approaches to optimize the overall US sleep health.

References 39

  1. 1.

    Kuehn BM. Sleep duration linked to cardiovascular disease. Circulation. 2019;139(21):2483-2484

    Not in our library10.1161/circulationaha.119.041278

  2. 2.

    Fan M, Sun D, Zhou T,. Sleep patterns, genetic susceptibility, and incident cardiovascular disease: a prospective study of 385 292 UK biobank participants. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(11):1182-1189

    Not in our library10.1093/eurheartj/ehz849

  3. 3.

    Baden MY, Hu FB, Vetter C, Schernhammer E, Redline S, Huang T. Sleep duration patterns in early to middle adulthood and subsequent risk of type 2 diabetes in women. Diabetes Care. 2020;43(6):1219-1226

    Not in our library10.2337/dc19-2371

  4. 4.

    Kyle SD, Sexton CE, Feige B,. Sleep and cognitive performance: cross-sectional associations in the UK Biobank. Sleep Med. 2017;38:85-91

    Not in our library10.1016/j.sleep.2017.07.001

  5. 5.

    Daghlas I, Dashti HS, Lane J,. Sleep duration and myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74(10):1304-1314

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jacc.2019.07.022

  6. 6.

    Daghlas I, Lane JM, Saxena R, Vetter C. Genetically proxied diurnal preference, sleep timing, and risk of major depressive disorder. JAMA Psychiatry. 2021;78(8):903-910

    Not in our library10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.0959

  7. 7.

    Czeisler CA, Gooley JJ. Sleep and circadian rhythms in humans. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2007;72:579-597

    Not in our library10.1101/sqb.2007.72.064

  8. 8.

    Roenneberg T, Allebrandt KV, Merrow M, Vetter C. Social jetlag and obesity. Curr Biol. 2012;22(10):939-943

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cub.2012.03.038

  9. 9.

    Wittmann M, Dinich J, Merrow M, Roenneberg T. Social jetlag: misalignment of biological and social time. Chronobiol Int. 2006;23(1-2):497-509

    Not in our library10.1080/07420520500545979

  10. 10.

    Ford ES, Cunningham TJ, Croft JB. Trends in self-reported sleep duration among US adults from 1985 to 2012. Sleep. 2015;38(5):829-832

    Not in our library10.5665/sleep.4684

  11. 11.

    Hou Y, Liu X, Liu J. Trends in self-reported sleep duration and disturbance in the US general population: NHANES 2005-2014. Sleep (Basel). 2018;41(suppl 1):A110

    Not in our library10.1093/sleep/zsy061.286

  12. 12.

    Chan MT, Anderson PJ, Chan JC, Lau GS, Critchley JA. Single-dose pharmacokinetics of paracetamol and its conjugates in Chinese non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients with renal impairment. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1997;52(4):285-288

    Not in our library10.1007/s002280050291

  13. 13.

    Curtin LR, Mohadjer LK, Dohrmann SM,. The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey: sample design, 1999-2006. Vital Health Stat 2. 2012 (155):1-39.

    Not in our library

  14. 14.

    von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Int J Surg. 2014;12(12):1495-1499

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.07.013

  15. 15.

    Roenneberg T, Wirz-Justice A, Merrow M. Life between clocks: daily temporal patterns of human chronotypes. J Biol Rhythms. 2003;18(1):80-90

    Not in our library10.1177/0748730402239679

  16. 16.

    Mokhlesi B, Temple KA, Tjaden AH,; RISE Consortium. Association of self-reported sleep and circadian measures with glycemia in adults with prediabetes or recently diagnosed untreated type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(7):1326-1332

    Not in our library10.2337/dc19-0298

  17. 17.
  18. 18.

    Cash RE, Crowe RP, Goldberg SA,. Association between sleep characteristics, ideal cardiovascular health, and systemic inflammation, NHANES 2017-2018. J Sleep Res. 2022;31(2):e13497

    Not in our library10.1111/jsr.13497

  19. 19.

    Cabeza de Baca T, Chayama KL, Redline S,. Sleep debt: the impact of weekday sleep deprivation on cardiovascular health in older women. Sleep. 2019;42(10):zsz149

    Not in our library10.1093/sleep/zsz149

  20. 20.

    Shan Z, Rehm CD, Rogers G,. Trends in dietary carbohydrate, protein, and fat intake and diet quality among US adults, 1999-2016. JAMA. 2019;322(12):1178-1187

    Not in our library10.1001/jama.2019.13771

  21. 21.

    Wolfson JA, Bleich SN. Is cooking at home associated with better diet quality or weight-loss intention? Public Health Nutr. 2015;18(8):1397-1406

    Not in our library10.1017/s1368980014001943

  22. 22.

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey (NHANES) Analytic and Reporting Guidelines. CDC; 2006.

    Not in our library

  23. 23.

    Wolter KM. Introduction to Variance Estimation. 2nd ed. Springer; 2007.

    Not in our library

  24. 24.

    Li Y, Graubard BI. Testing Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium and homogeneity of Hardy-Weinberg disequilibrium using complex survey data. Biometrics. 2009;65(4):1096-1104

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1541-0420.2009.01199.x

  25. 25.

    Liu Y, Wheaton AG, Chapman DP, Cunningham TJ, Lu H, Croft JB. Prevalence of healthy sleep duration among adults—United States, 2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;65(6):137-141

    Not in our library10.15585/mmwr.mm6506a1

  26. 26.

    Blackwelder A, Hoskins M, Huber L. Effect of inadequate sleep on frequent mental distress. Prev Chronic Dis. 2021;18:E61

    Not in our library10.5888/pcd18.200573

  27. 27.

    Bayon V, Leger D, Gomez-Merino D, Vecchierini MF, Chennaoui M. Sleep debt and obesity. Ann Med. 2014;46(5):264-272

    Not in our library10.3109/07853890.2014.931103

  28. 28.

    van Dijk D, Balkau B, Segrestin B,; EGIR-RISC Study Group. Associations between sleep duration and sleep debt with insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion in the EGIR-RISC Study. Diabetes Metab. 2019;45(4):375-381

    Not in our library10.1016/j.diabet.2018.11.001

  29. 29.

    Okajima I, Komada Y, Ito W, Inoue Y. Sleep debt and social jetlag associated with sleepiness, mood, and work performance among workers in Japan. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(6):2908

    Not in our library10.3390/ijerph18062908

  30. 30.

    Urbanek JK, Spira AP, Di J, Leroux A, Crainiceanu C, Zipunnikov V. Epidemiology of objectively measured bedtime and chronotype in US adolescents and adults: NHANES 2003-2006. Chronobiol Int. 2018;35(3):416-434

    Not in our library10.1080/07420528.2017.1411359

  31. 31.

    Wang C, Hu B, Rangarajan S,; Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) study investigators. Association of bedtime with mortality and major cardiovascular events: an analysis of 112,198 individuals from 21 countries in the PURE study. Sleep Med. 2021;80:265-272

    Not in our library10.1016/j.sleep.2021.01.057

  32. 32.

    Morris CJ, Purvis TE, Hu K, Scheer FA. Circadian misalignment increases cardiovascular disease risk factors in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113(10):E1402-E1411

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1516953113

  33. 33.

    Vetter C, Devore EE, Ramin CA, Speizer FE, Willett WC, Schernhammer ES. Mismatch of sleep and work timing and risk of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(9):1707-1713

    Not in our library10.2337/dc15-0302

  34. 34.

    Ford ES, Cunningham TJ, Giles WH, Croft JB. Trends in insomnia and excessive daytime sleepiness among U.S. adults from 2002 to 2012. Sleep Med. 2015;16(3):372-378

    Not in our library10.1016/j.sleep.2014.12.008

  35. 35.

    Cai Y, Chen M, Zhai W, Wang C. Interaction between trouble sleeping and depression on hypertension in the NHANES 2005-2018. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):481

    Not in our library10.1186/s12889-022-12942-2

  36. 36.

    Li J, Covassin N, Bock JM,. Excessive daytime sleepiness and cardiovascular mortality in US adults: a NHANES 2005-2008 follow-up study. Nat Sci Sleep. 2021;13:1049-1059

    Not in our library10.2147/nss.s319675

  37. 37.

    Jehan S, Myers AK, Zizi F,. Sleep health disparity: the putative role of race, ethnicity and socioeconomic status. Sleep Med Disord. 2018;2(5):127-133.

    Not in our library

  38. 38.

    Drake CL, Roehrs T, Richardson G, Walsh JK, Roth T. Shift work sleep disorder: prevalence and consequences beyond that of symptomatic day workers. Sleep. 2004;27(8):1453-1462

    Not in our library10.1093/sleep/27.8.1453

  39. 39.

    Ertel KA, Berkman LF, Buxton OM. Socioeconomic status, occupational characteristics, and sleep duration in African/Caribbean immigrants and US White health care workers. Sleep. 2011;34(4):509-518

    Not in our library10.1093/sleep/34.4.509

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.