Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 26, 2026.

Characteristics, Outcomes, and Severity Risk Factors Associated With SARS-CoV-2 Infection Among Children in the US National COVID Cohort Collaborative

Blake Martin, Peter E. DeWitt, Seth Russell and 18 more

JAMA Network Open · 2022

doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.43151

Abstract

Importance: Understanding of SARS-CoV-2 infection in US children has been limited by the lack of large, multicenter studies with granular data. Objective: To examine the characteristics, changes over time, outcomes, and severity risk factors of children with SARS-CoV-2 within the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C). Design, Setting, and Participants: A prospective cohort study of encounters with end dates before September 24, 2021, was conducted at 56 N3C facilities throughout the US. Participants included children younger than 19 years at initial SARS-CoV-2 testing. Main Outcomes and Measures: Case incidence and severity over time, demographic and comorbidity severity risk factors, vital sign and laboratory trajectories, clinical outcomes, and acute COVID-19 vs multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C), and Delta vs pre-Delta variant differences for children with SARS-CoV-2. Results: A total of 1 068 410 children were tested for SARS-CoV-2 and 167 262 test results (15.6%) were positive (82 882 [49.6%] girls; median age, 11.9 [IQR, 6.0-16.1] years). Among the 10 245 children (6.1%) who were hospitalized, 1423 (13.9%) met the criteria for severe disease: mechanical ventilation (796 [7.8%]), vasopressor-inotropic support (868 [8.5%]), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (42 [0.4%]), or death (131 [1.3%]). Male sex (odds ratio [OR], 1.37; 95% CI, 1.21-1.56), Black/African American race (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.06-1.47), obesity (OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.01-1.41), and several pediatric complex chronic condition (PCCC) subcategories were associated with higher severity disease. Vital signs and many laboratory test values from the day of admission were predictive of peak disease severity. Variables associated with increased odds for MIS-C vs acute COVID-19 included male sex (OR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.33-1.90), Black/African American race (OR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.17-1.77), younger than 12 years (OR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.51-2.18), obesity (OR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.40-2.22), and not having a pediatric complex chronic condition (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.65-0.80). The children with MIS-C had a more inflammatory laboratory profile and severe clinical phenotype, with higher rates of invasive ventilation (117 of 707 [16.5%] vs 514 of 8241 [6.2%]; P < .001) and need for vasoactive-inotropic support (191 of 707 [27.0%] vs 426 of 8241 [5.2%]; P < .001) compared with those who had acute COVID-19. Comparing children during the Delta vs pre-Delta eras, there was no significant change in hospitalization rate (1738 [6.0%] vs 8507 [6.2%]; P = .18) and lower odds for severe disease (179 [10.3%] vs 1242 [14.6%]) (decreased by a factor of 0.67; 95% CI, 0.57-0.79; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of US children with SARS-CoV-2, there were observed differences in demographic characteristics, preexisting comorbidities, and initial vital sign and laboratory values between severity subgroups. Taken together, these results suggest that early identification of children likely to progress to severe disease could be achieved using readily available data elements from the day of admission. Further work is needed to translate this knowledge into improved outcomes.

Full text

Its licence does not allow us to show the full text. Read it at PubMed Central:

Read at PubMed Central

References 32

  1. 1.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  2. 2.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1111/apa.15270

  3. 3.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1002/jmv.25807

  4. 4.
  5. 5.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa2021680

  6. 6.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1001/jama.2021.2091

  7. 7.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/s2352-4642(20)30177-2

  8. 8.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1542/peds.2020-023432

  9. 9.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.1948

  10. 10.
  11. 11.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  12. 12.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(20)31103-x

  13. 13.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.0630

  14. 14.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.5052

  15. 15.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1093/jamia/ocaa196

  16. 16.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  17. 17.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  18. 18.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  19. 19.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  20. 20.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/s1473-3099(20)30483-7

  21. 21.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  22. 22.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.0256

  23. 23.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  24. 24.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.12788/jhm.3552

  25. 25.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  26. 26.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa2021436

  27. 27.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1001/jama.2021.0694

  28. 28.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1542/hpeds.2020-001917

  29. 29.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.arcped.2020.05.010

  30. 30.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.2430

  31. 31.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1002/jmv.26208

  32. 32.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

Cited by papers we hold 1

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.