On the power of Ambainis's lower bounds

The polynomial method and the Ambainis's lower bound (or \emph{Alb}, for short) method are two main quantum lower bound techniques. While recently Ambainis showed that the polynomial method is not tight, the present paper aims at studying the power and limitation of \emph{Alb}'s. We first use known \emph{Alb}'s to derive $Ω(n^{1.5})$ lower bounds for \textsc{Bipartiteness}, \textsc{Bipartiteness Matching} and \textsc{Graph Matching}, in which the lower bound for \textsc{Bipartiteness} improves the previous $Ω(n)$ one. We then show that all the three known Ambainis's lower bounds have a limitation $\sqrt{N\cdot \min\{C_0(f), C_1(f)\}}$, where $C_0(f)$ and $C_1(f)$ are the 0- and 1-certificate complexity, respectively. This implies that for some problems such as \textsc{Triangle}, $k$-\textsc{Clique}, and \textsc{Bipartite/Graph Matching} which draw wide interest and whose quantum query complexities are still open, the best known lower bounds cannot be further improved by using Ambainis's techniques. Another consequence is that all the Ambainis's lower bounds are not tight. For total functions, this upper bound for \emph{Alb}'s can be further improved to $\min \{\sqrt{C_0(f)C_1(f)}, \sqrt{N\cdot CI(f)}\}$, where $CI(f)$ is the size of max intersection of a 0-and a 1-certificate set. Again this implies that $Alb$'s cannot improve the best known lower bound for some specific problems such as \textsc{And-Or Tree}, whose precise quantum query complexity is still open. Finally, we generalize the three known \emph{Alb}'s and give a new \emph{Alb} style lower bound method, which may be easier to use for some problems.

Abstract licence: CC0

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.