Common misrepresentation of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen argument
V. Hnizdo
Found. Phys. Lett. 11, 359-369 (1998) · 2000
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
A frequently given version of the argument of Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen against the completeness of the quantum mechanical description is criticized as a misrepresentation that lacks the cogency of the original EPR argument.
Abstract licence: CC0
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.