Comment on "Radial dependence of radiation from a bounded source" by Kirk T. McDonald
A. Ardavan, H. Ardavan, J. Singleton
2006
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
The purpose of this note is to point out that McDonald's criticism of our work \cite{r1} is based on a circular argument. In order to show that the field of a bounded source falls off as $f(θ,ϕ)/r$ in the far zone, McDonald uses a Huygens-Kirchhoff diffraction integral whose derivation (from Maxwell's equations) already entails assuming a fall-off of this form for the field at infinity \cite{r2}. ($r$, $θ$ and $ϕ$ are the spherical polar coordinates centred on a point within the source, and $f$ is a factor independent of $r$.
Abstract licence: CC0
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.