Classical Logic = Fibred MLL
Dominic Hughes
2005
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
This paper represents classical propositional proofs as *combinatorial proofs*, which are more abstract than proof nets: superposition (contraction/weakening) is modelled mathematically, as a lax form of fibration, rather than syntactically (as in proof nets, which involve contraction and weakening nodes). A combinatorial proof is a `fibred' multiplicative linear proof net, hence the slogan in the title. Cut elimination retains its richness from sequent calculus: its non-determinism does not collapse to become confluent. [Note: this is merely a 2-page synopsis, accepted for a short presentation at Logic in Computer Science '05.]
Abstract licence: CC0
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.