Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

The pair $(\aleph_n,\aleph_0)$ may fail $\aleph_0$--compactness

Saharon Shelah

in: {Logic Colloquium '01} (2005) 402--433 · 2004

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

Let P be a distinguished unary predicate and K= {M: M a model of cardinality aleph_n with P^M of cardinality aleph_0}. We prove that consistently for n=4, for some countable first order theory T we have: T has no model in K whereas every finite subset of T has a model in K. We then show how we prove it also for n=2, too.

Abstract licence: CC0

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.