The B -> pi pi,pi K Puzzles in the Light of New Data: Implications for the Standard Model, New Physics and Rare Decays
Andrzej J. Buras, Robert Fleischer, Stefan Recksiegel and 1 more
Acta Phys.Polon. B36 (2005) 2015-2050 · 2004
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
Recently, we developed a strategy to analyse the B -> pi pi,pi K data. We found that the B -> pi pi measurements can be accommodated in the Standard Model (SM) through large non-factorizable effects. On the other hand, our analysis of the ratios R_c and R_n of the CP-averaged branching ratios of the charged and neutral B -> pi K modes, respectively, suggested new physics (NP) in the electroweak penguin sector, which may have a powerful interplay with rare decays. In this paper, we confront our strategy with recent experimental developments, addressing also the direct CP violation in B_d -> pi^-+ K^+-, which is now an established effect, the relation to its counterpart in B^+- -> pi^0 K^+-, and the first results for the direct CP asymmetry of B_d -> pi^0 pi^0 that turn out to be in agreement with our prediction. We obtain hadronic B -> pi pi,pi K parameters which are almost unchanged and arrive at an allowed region for the unitarity triangle in perfect accordance with the SM. The ``B -> pi K puzzle'' persists, and can still be explained through NP, as in our previous analysis. In fact, the recently observed shifts in the experimental values of R_c and R_n have been predicted in our framework on the basis of constraints from rare decays. Conversely, we obtain a moderate deviation of the ratio R of the CP-averaged B_d -> pi^-+ K^+- and B^+- -> pi^+- K rates from the current experimental value. However, using the emerging signals for B^+- -> K^+- K modes, this effect can be attributed to certain hadronic effects, which have a minor impact on R_c and do not at all affect R_n. Our results for rare decays remain unchanged.
Abstract licence: CC0
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.