Combining Independent Modules in Lexical Multiple-Choice Problems
Peter D. Turney, Michael L. Littman, Jeffrey Bigham and 1 more
Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing III: Selected Papers from RANLP 2003, Eds: N. Nicolov, K. Botcheva, G. Angelova, and R. Mitkov, (2004), Current Issues in Linguistic Theory (CILT), 260, John Benjamins, 101-110 · 2005
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
Existing statistical approaches to natural language problems are very coarse approximations to the true complexity of language processing. As such, no single technique will be best for all problem instances. Many researchers are examining ensemble methods that combine the output of multiple modules to create more accurate solutions. This paper examines three merging rules for combining probability distributions: the familiar mixture rule, the logarithmic rule, and a novel product rule. These rules were applied with state-of-the-art results to two problems used to assess human mastery of lexical semantics -- synonym questions and analogy questions. All three merging rules result in ensembles that are more accurate than any of their component modules. The differences among the three rules are not statistically significant, but it is suggestive that the popular mixture rule is not the best rule for either of the two problems.
Abstract licence: CC0
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.