Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

Constraints on the prevalence of luminous, dusty starbursts at very high redshifts

R. J. Ivison

2007

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

At a conference devoted to ever deeper surveys hunting for ever more distant galaxies, I posed a question for which a concensus view has been difficult to reach: `Is there evidence for, or can we rule out, a significant population of dust-obscured starbursts at z > 3?' If, as seems likely, submm-selected galaxies are proto-ellipticals, one of the biggest unanswered questions is whether a significant fraction form at very high redshift - perhaps by the collapse of single gas clouds - or whether the entire population forms over a range of redshifts, primarily via merging. The latter scenario is favoured strongly by existing data for the majority of bright submm galaxies - mergers are common; typical spectroscopic redshifts are in the range 1 to 3. However, our reliance on radio imaging to pinpoint submm galaxies leaves open the possibility of a significant population of very distant, massive starbursts. To rule out such a scenario requires a completely unbiased redshift distribution for submm-selected galaxies and this is unlikely to be forthcoming using conventional optical/infrared spectroscopic techniques. Here, I summarise recent attempts to close that door, or pass through to an early Universe inhabited by a significant population of collosal, dust-obscured starbursts. I conclude that the door is only barely ajar; however, the idea of galaxies forming, near instantaneously, on a collosal scale is not dead: I show an SMG imaged by MERLIN+VLA for >1Ms - the deepest high-resolution radio image so far obtained. The data reveal a galaxy-wide starburst covering >=10kpc. Thus interpreting SMGs in terms of compact ULIRG-like events may not always be appropriate, as one might expect when considering the Eddington limit for >~1000M(sun)/yr starbursts.

Abstract licence: CC0

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.